home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / dcom / modems-part1 / 5006 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  940 b 
  1. Path: northshore.shore.net!wetboy
  2. From: wetboy@shore.net (wetboy)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,alt.comp.hardware
  4. Subject: Re: CARDINAL Modems SUCK!
  5. Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems,alt.comp.hardware
  6. Date: 20 Feb 1996 14:14:48 GMT
  7. Organization: Shore.Net/Eco Software, Inc; (info@shore.net)
  8. Message-ID: <4gcl0o$73t@shore.shore.net>
  9. References: <3124D1D0.16D7@a.crl.com> <4g2qh5$d8g@artemis.it.luc.edu> <31259572.2BE3@donuts.com> <4g4v1f$5dm@darwin.nbnet.nb.ca> <31275e7c.13192236@nntp5.mindspring.com>
  10. NNTP-Posting-Host: northshore.shore.net
  11. X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
  12.  
  13. Phil Haseltine (philh@mindspring.com) wrote:
  14. : Andrew Trevors <virtual1@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:
  15.  
  16. : >dunkin@donuts.com wrote:
  17. : >>I have to agree with the point that cardinal modems suck...  I also 
  18.  
  19. I have a Cardinal MVP288I, and have used it exclusively for 6 months
  20. with no problems at all.  28800 bit/sec connections almost always, since
  21. I switched ISPs.
  22.  
  23. -- Wetboy
  24.